Examining all other models with regard to this aspect we see that – apart from our proton model – none of the introduced models completely satisfies this condition (see below). Anyway, it is mostly infringed in model Ia. The charged λ-hyperon requires a “support”, which it receives with the addition of the second charge. This second charge in some way “helps” to “bridge” the range of missing self-interaction by the Coulomb attraction.

Based on this knowledge we can expand the stability theorem:

Now we come to the already announced hypothesis that none of the introduced particle models (the proton excluded) satisfies this extended stability theorem. Let us begin with model TaOu. Here, the self-interaction is not a constant value at eight points of the orbit (namely the points at which the direction of self-interaction discontinuously changes), its value of change being constant according to amount while its direction changes discontinuously.

We have already discussed the circumstances with the model Ia, where there is a “lack” of self-interaction along certain orbital segments. The same is true with the presented Model Oa. By contrast in the models Tu, Da, and Iu there is an “excess” of self-interaction along certain segments of the orbit. However, this “excess” is not directed such that the charge is fixed to the given path; instead it has a “deflecting” effect. It is only the proton (Ha), whose “excess” of self-interaction acts in the same direction and “sticks” the charge to the given orbit when the direction of self-interaction changes.
(The reader can understand these considerations easily on his own by implementing simple wire models, because it would take us too far to provide two-dimensional drawings of all figures..)

To make a long story short, for our collection of indications it will be sufficient to state that we can conclude from the stability theorem:
there is no stable elementary particle (the proton exempted).