This is still nothing new, but now it becomes interesting: shortly after the calculation of Planck’s constant, we had given an illustrative explanation of the self-interaction mechanism and failed to examine the direction that is perpendicular to the plane of the eddy. But it is clear to the observer that the flux lines can be pushed aside to the convex part of the orbit in only one direction – i.e. in the forward-movement direction of the charge. Thus, the magnetic space eddy appears, depending on the sign of the generating charge, as a right- and left-hand helix, respectively. Now we look at our proton model in the spin direction (Fig. 47). We have to acknowledge that the individual rosette lobes will travel in a direction such that the charge alternately follows a right- or a left-hand helixbolt. Should it even be possible that an external electron, used as a probe, be so “half-blind” that it only perceives the movement of the positron that fits to the (own) right-hand system? Maybe this could be the extension of the magnetic field theorem we are looking for?

Such a sentence would be simple to illustrate,because if two magnetic fields with right- and left-hand systems collide, it would be like a nut with a right-hand thread that has to be screwed onto a bolt with a left-hand thread.

For a charge in the state of self-interaction, this condition is met for every part of the orbit. However everything changes if we discuss external interaction, because now it is important to which coordination system the “generating” and the “measuring” charge belong. But because all measurements in particle physics must be attributed to the movement of the electrons (because they are available for measuring) or be compared to their movement considered a measurement standard, one could be right to assume that only half the expected interaction will occur in a model belonging partly to the right-hand and partly to the left-hand system. Maybe this is the real meaning of the term spin?