This, of course, is superconduction. Then let us use the supplementary equations of the Maxwell equations, found phenomenologically by v. Laue and London that are satisfied by the supercurrent, and interpret them as follows: in the case of the superconduction, an external magnetic field produces antiparallel orientation in the directions 1, 2, 3, or 4 of our model. This hypothesis, however, requires a more detailed explanation.

As is well known, there are various kinds of magnetism of matter. We - in accordance with quantum theory - interpret ferromagnetism as a spin magnetism oriented toward the external magnetic field - of course in the sense of the introduced "orbital spin". This magnetism is definitely that part of our orbit's magnetic field which acts outwardly. Therefore, it corresponds to the external interaction and, thus, shows classical behavior, while orienting with respect to the external fields and appearing as paramagnetism - provided there are no grid alignment rules . The diamagnetism, however, must be attributed to the self-interaction. Due to our statements provided for the direction quantization and the Pauli principle, we have to realize that self-interaction - as long as it "does not want to be destroyed" - always tries to avoid the external fields or, if impossible, build up a counter field. However, since the superconductor is ideally diamagnetic and, moreover, meets our requirements of missing friction, it should be expected that the equations satisfied by the supercurrent are really the equations that control self-interaction. However, now we have to demand the absence of any external interaction for the electrons generating the supercurrent, i.e. the spin moments of said electrons are saturated pairwise. This requirement consistent with the explanation of superconduction provided by quantum theory is also considered to be an indication for the validity of our model. Further we see that for the spin saturation of our model - namely for full occupation of the spherical shell - the two electrons have actually the same sense of rotation around one of the given spatial directions (e.g., direction 1). This means that for spin saturation (no external interaction) the fields of self-interaction will not offset each other; i.e. diamagnetism may indeed exist.

Thus, we will interpret the two supplementary equations found by London and v. Laue as self-interaction equations and will explain very roughly the path to be followed: It should only be mentioned that the unproductive way we have taken thus far must not be followed again. According to the theorems previously formulated, it makes no sense to speak about Lorentz' force and centrifugal force as usually.